Astronomical Prediction Based on Patterns

This page will demonstrate that prediction in astronomy is based solely on patterns in the sky. Celestial events come in patterns and trends. By analyzing the patterns of past behaviors from historic tables it is possible to create an equation that will predict a future event. This is how prediction in astronomy has been performed for thousands of years, and how it is still performed today.

=Ancient Astronomy=

Ancient Babylonians
Astronomy for Physical Science - Cal State Long Beach (Archive)

Mathematical Thought from Ancient to Modern Times: Volume One

=Modern Astronomy=

Description and Function
Gravitation Vs. Relativity by Charles Lane Poor, PhD Full Text Link

Motion of the Planets p.132

Motion of the Planets p.138

Use in Astronomical Almanacs
From the Wikipedia section on Special Perturbations (Archive):

General Application
Perturbation methods are, in fact, prevalent in many areas of science. From Perturbations in Complex Molecular Systems | (Archive) we read the following:

The Wikipedia article on Perturbation Theory (Archive) echoes the same:

History
The Wikipedia article on Perturbation Theory also provides a history:

VSOP
VSOP (French: Variations Séculaires des Orbites Planétaires) is a popular software package used to generate planetary ephemeris, the position of astronomical objects in the sky. It is used in astronomy software such as Stellarium and Celestia. It has been alleged that VSOP uses a geometric RET model to make its predictions, and so VSOP and the astronomy software which use it is therefore validation of the theory. We find, however, that VSOP is based on the ancient pattern methods of epicycles and perturbations:

Comparing VSOP to the Ptolemaic System
The following is left by an editor on VSOP's Wikipedia Talk Page (Archive):

Comments from Celestia Developers
Celestia Developers comment on the large number of planet-specific terms used in computing positions:

https://celestia.space/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=8285 (Archive)

https://celestia.space/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=2592 (Archive)

Quotes
R. J. Morrison, F.A.S.L., R.N., in his "New Principia," says:

Sir Richard Phillips in his Million Factssays:

The Eclipses
In Chapter 11 of Earth Not a Globe its author gives us an overview of the eclipse calculations:

— Samuel Birley Rowbotham

The Royal Astronomer Sir Robert Ball, in his work The Story of the Heavens, on page 58, informs us:

Somerville in Physical Sciences pg. 46 states:

T.G. Ferguson in the Earth Review for September 1894, told us:

NASA Eclipse Website
Website URL: https://eclipse.gsfc.nasa.gov

If one visits NASA's eclipse website they will find that NASA explains eclipse prediction through the ancient Saros Cycle, rather than the Three Body Problem of astronomy.

From Resources -> Eclipses and the Saros (Archive) we read a description of the Saros Cycle:

The reader is encouraged to visit NASA's eclipse website and count how many times the Saros Cycle is mentioned, and then count how many times the Three Body Problem is mentioned.

Google Search Term: "saros" site:https://eclipse.gsfc.nasa.gov

No. of Results: 13,700

Google Search Term: "three body" site:https://eclipse.gsfc.nasa.gov

No. of Results: 2 (duplicate text)

The Three Body Problem refers to the greatest problem in the history of astronomy. It is the inability of science to simulate or recreate a model of the Sun-Earth-Moon system. It is for this reason that pattern-based methods must be used for prediction in astronomy.