Michelson-Morley Experiment

The Michelson–Morley experiment was an experiment that was first performed in 1887 by Albert A. Michelson and Edward W. Morley. Unfortunately, a number of writers on this topic tend to gloss over, or sometimes mischaracterize, what this experiment demonstrated, its significance, and how it was a turning point in science which necessitated the adoption of a radically different and alternative model of space.

At the time it was held that in order for light to travel through space it was necessary that there was a medium filling the void through which it could propagate, much like how sound waves travel through the air or ripples through water. This background medium of space was colloquially known as 'aether' (See: Aether).

The goal of the Michelson–Morley experiment was to compare the speed of light in perpendicular horizontal directions at various times of the day, in an attempt to detect the relative motion of matter through the stationary luminiferous aether by using the rotation of the earth and its motion around the sun to create interference bands of light for the study. Morley wrote to his father that the purpose of the experiment was “to see if light travels with the same velocity in all directions.”1

The shocking result of this experiment is that light did travel with the same velocity in the various horizontal directions tested. The earth did not measurably move around the sun at all, in contradiction to all expectations and the accepted astronomical model. Michelson and Morley found that a light beam discharged horizontally in the direction of the Earth’s assumed motion showed virtually no difference in speed from a light beam discharged north to south or south to north. In other words, the experiment failed to detect the Earth moving in or against space, of whatever space was understood to consist.

After the famous Michelson-Morley experiment of 1887, one of Albert Einstein's biographers, Ronald W. Clark, describes what came next:

Michelson and Morley and later scientists repeated the experiment many times, and in many different horizontal axial positions and configurations, at different times of the day, all with a null result. The earth was seen to be motionless. The experiment has been referred to as "the moving-off point for the theoretical aspects of the Second Scientific Revolution"3 and directly influenced the creation of Albert Einstein's Theory of Special Relativity.

The Theory of Special Relativity subsequently found favor among scientific circles because the second postulate of Special Relativity provided an illusion where the velocity of light is constant to all observers, and seemingly explained the motionless earth result of the Michelson-Morley experiment. This fundamental change to the nature of space and time allowed the theory of the earth's motion around the sun to survive direct contradicting experimental evidence and encouraged, perhaps forced, its adoption as the accepted model of space for Heliocentrism.

G.J. Whitrow, a British mathematician, cosmologist, and science historian, characterized the Michaelson-Morley experiment from a historical perspective:

1 Letter dated April 17, 1887, in the Edward W. Morley Papers, Library of Congress, as cited  in  Dorothy  Michelson Livingston’s Master of Light: A Biography of Albert Michelson, New York, Charles Scribner, 1973, p.126. 2 Einstein: The  Life  and  Times,  Avon  Book,  New  York,  NY,  1984,  p.  109-110. 3 Hoover, Earl R. (1977). Cradle of greatness : national and world achievements of Ohio's Western Reserve 4 G. J. Whitrow, The Structure and Evolution of the Universe, New York, Harper and Brothers Publishers, 1959, p. 79.

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/Relativ/mmhist.html (Archive)

=Description and Result=

Material from a York University course by Prof. Byron E. Wall provides a good summary of the Michelson-Morley experiment and its result. Below are slides that tell the story. Interested readers should feel free to go through the entire slide deck.

Course Description (Archive) Full Slideshow (.ppt Archive)



Lorentz–FitzGerald Contraction
The Lorentz–FitzGerald Contraction, also known as the Lorentz Contraction, was supported by Einstein and became a part of Special Relativity.

— Albert Einstein, 1916

— Encyclopedia Britannica

— Physicsclassroom.com

— "Albert A. Michelson," The Astrophysical Journal, July 1931, p.4

=Peer Reviews and Repetitions=

Since 1887 the Michelson-Morley experiment has been repeated and verified on many occasions, with several different methodologies. The Michelson-Morley Wikipedia article (Archive) maintains a list of subsequent experiments.

A 2009 repetition of the experiment is described below:

2009 Repetition in Germany
https://physicsworld.com/a/michelson-morley-experiment-is-best-yet/ (Archive)

Michelson–Morley experiment is best yet

=Influence of the MiMo Experiment on Relativity=

In a lecture titled How I Created the Theory of Relativity (Archive) Albert Einstein points this experiment out as a basis on developing Special Relativity:

Einstein also mentions in regards to SR: "I also started to work on the problem of Fizeau’s experiment and tried to account for it," which is another light velocity experiment.

Historical Marker
In Cleveland, Ohio, there is a Michelson-Morley Historical Marker located just outside the science building on the Case Western Reserve University campus which provides the following:

The marker describes that, when science was confronted with direct evidence of an earth without motion around the sun, an entirely new model of space and time was required to explain it.

Why Relativity Was Accepted
Why Was Relativity Accepted? By Stephen G. Brush

Full Text: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.535.1670&rep=rep1&type=pdf (Archive)

An interesting analysis on why Relativity was accepted in science. The author concludes that much of why it was accepted is because it was a world-model which purported to explain the Michelson-Morley experimental result of a motionless earth. Another top reason was because of an underlying desire for a unified, elegant physical theory.

The author provides quotes by the scientists of the day, identifying the Michelson-Morley null result as a primary factor.

Statistical Tables
The author provides three statistical analysis tables for why Relativity was accepted, focusing on Empirical reasons, Social-Psychological reasons, and Aesthetic-Mathematical reasons.




 * Abbreviation Reference
 * Empirical
 * MiMo — negative result of Michelson-Morley experiment
 * EtDr — failure of ether drift experiments
 * ElMa — variation of electron mass with velocity
 * ElCh — variation of electron charge with velocity
 * VeLi — velocity of light from terrestrial and celestial sources is the same
 * BoOr — correction of orbits and energy levels in Bohr model of atom
 * LiBe — light-bending observations
 * MePe — Advance of Mercury Perihelion
 * GrRe — Gravitational redshift of spectral lines
 * Social-Psychological
 * NSTh — rejection of absolute space and time is consistent with neo-scholastic theology
 * MoSc — association with ‘‘modern’’ science
 * PoSt — relativism of political structures, attractive to anti-democratic ideologues
 * CoIC — acquire prestige for comprehending the incomprehensible
 * GePh — respect for authority of German physics
 * Aesthetic-Mathematical
 * Math — mathematical aspects of the theory
 * Unif — desire for a unified, elegant physical theory
 * EMWV — connection with electromagnetic worldview
 * NEGe — connection with Lobachevsky’s non-Euclidean geometry
 * Unif — desire for a unified, elegant physical theory
 * EMWV — connection with electromagnetic worldview
 * NEGe — connection with Lobachevsky’s non-Euclidean geometry

The reader should note that the Michelson-Morley Experiments are a subset of the "failure of the ether drift experiments," which are a larger collection of experiments which have failed to detect earth's motion through space. The Michelson-Morley Experiment is the most known and famous experiment of the collection.

"VeLi — velocity of light from terrestrial and celestial sources is the same" refers to Airy's Failure

=How Einstein Made the Earth Move=

Video: How Einstein Made the Earth Move By Jeran Campanella and Robert Sungenis

Description: "This video is a reading of a PDF written by Robert Sungenis in 2016 called "Albert Einstein: The Earth Mover- How Einstein Made The Earth Move (When All The Experiments Showed It Didn't Move)" This video will challenge you to decide which belief is pseudoscientific... the belief that the Earth moves... or that it stands still."

PDF Direct Link

=Quotes=

Below are miscellaneous quotes from various physicists and authors on the topic of the Michelson-Morley Experiment.

=See Also=


 * The Sagnac Experiment
 * The Vertical Michelson-Morley Experiments
 * Airy's Failure
 * Aether