|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | Jeran Campanella reads an article by Bjørn Ekeberg, Ph.D. at Scientific American titled [https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/cosmology-has-some-big-problems/?redirect=1 ''Cosmology Has Some Big Problems''] ([http://archive.fo/a7tHV#selection-453.2-459.13 Archive]) which depicts the many problems of Modern Cosmology, essentially calling it a folktale. Runtime: 40m
| |
| | | | |
| − | {{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FSREKOX4Img}}
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ==Questions and Answers==
| |
| − |
| |
| − | '''Q.''' What does this have to do with RET?<br>
| |
| − | '''A.''' General Relativity, Special Relativity, Doppler, Newton's laws, etc., are all based on earthly experiments and interpretations. Those laws do not work in the giant universe proposed by RET.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | '''Q.''' Cosmology may be a mystery, but astronomers can explain things locally.<br>
| |
| − | '''A.''' See the '''[[Three Body Problem]]'''
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ==See Also==
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :*'''[[Problems of the Galaxies]]''' - The galaxies do not behave in accordance with physical laws
| |
| − | :*'''[[Cosmological Principle]]''' - Observations suggesting that we are at the center of the universe must be discarded and reinterpreted
| |
| − | :*'''[[Quotes That Tell Us We Have All Been Lied To]]''' - Statements showing that fundamental concepts in astronomy are untenable or unverified, and that rejection of evidence or the invocation of illusions are used to explain failings
| |
| − |
| |
| − | [[Category:Cosmos]]
| |
| − | [[Category:Stars]]
| |
| − | [[Category:Cosmology]]
| |
