Difference between revisions of "Cosmology Has Some Big Problems"
From The Flat Earth Wiki
Tom Bishop (talk | contribs) |
PeteSvarrior (talk | contribs) m (Reverted edits by 107.167.244.83 (talk) to last revision by Tom Bishop) Tag: Rollback |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
==See Also== | ==See Also== | ||
| − | |||
:*'''[[Problems of the Galaxies]]''' - The galaxies do not behave in accordance with physical laws | :*'''[[Problems of the Galaxies]]''' - The galaxies do not behave in accordance with physical laws | ||
:*'''[[Cosmological Principle]]''' - Observations suggesting that we are at the center of the universe must be discarded and reinterpreted | :*'''[[Cosmological Principle]]''' - Observations suggesting that we are at the center of the universe must be discarded and reinterpreted | ||
Latest revision as of 17:22, 15 October 2022
Jeran Campanella reads an article by Bjørn Ekeberg, Ph.D. at Scientific American titled Cosmology Has Some Big Problems (Archive) which depicts the many problems of Modern Cosmology, essentially calling it a folktale. Runtime: 40m
Questions and Answers
Q. What does this have to do with RET?
A. General Relativity, Special Relativity, Doppler, Newton's laws, etc., are all based on earthly experiments and interpretations. Those laws do not work in the giant universe proposed by RET.
Q. Cosmology may be a mystery, but astronomers can explain things locally.
A. See the Three Body Problem
See Also
- Problems of the Galaxies - The galaxies do not behave in accordance with physical laws
- Cosmological Principle - Observations suggesting that we are at the center of the universe must be discarded and reinterpreted
- Quotes That Tell Us We Have All Been Lied To - Statements showing that fundamental concepts in astronomy are untenable or unverified, and that rejection of evidence or the invocation of illusions are used to explain failings