Difference between revisions of "Kings Dethroned"
Tom Bishop (talk | contribs) |
Tom Bishop (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Description: "A history of the evolution of astronomy from the time of the Roman Empire up to the present day; showing it to be an amazing series of blunders founded upon an error made in the second century B.C." | Description: "A history of the evolution of astronomy from the time of the Roman Empire up to the present day; showing it to be an amazing series of blunders founded upon an error made in the second century B.C." | ||
| − | The triangulation methods of astronomy described in the book Kings Dethroned are still in use today. The work goes over the methods used to determine the size and distances to the | + | The triangulation methods of astronomy described in the book Kings Dethroned are still in use today. The work goes over the methods used to determine the size and distances to the celestial bodies in the solar system and the assumptions used. |
==Reviews== | ==Reviews== | ||
Revision as of 06:08, 8 April 2019
One work of interest on the matter of the celestial bodies is a book called Kings Dethroned which was published in 1922. Gerrard Hickson assesses the methods used in Round Earth astronomy and finds them to be flawed and fallacious.
by Gerrard Hickson
Description: "A history of the evolution of astronomy from the time of the Roman Empire up to the present day; showing it to be an amazing series of blunders founded upon an error made in the second century B.C."
The triangulation methods of astronomy described in the book Kings Dethroned are still in use today. The work goes over the methods used to determine the size and distances to the celestial bodies in the solar system and the assumptions used.
Reviews
books.google.com (Archive)
“ This book is very thought-provoking! I couldn't put it down! Now I am looking everywhere for the promised sequel, "The Universe as it Is". As a former astronomy major, it seems so clear to me that the blunders that Mr. Hickson so ably describes have indeed been made the flawed foundation for a very grand and deadly edifice of error in the subject of astronomy. And yet the world laughs at 'crackpots' like Gerrard Hickson, and condemns his work to MIT's 'Library of Useless Research' because it dares to challenge the underpinnings of this whole imaginary astronomical philosophy. Highly recommended! ”
Another review by Forgotten Books:
https://www.forgottenbooks.com/en/books/KingsDethroned_10031911 (Archive)
“ At the turn of the twentieth century, Gerrard Hickson stumbled upon a discovery which convinced him of something shocking. The giants of astronomy had miscalculated the distance of the sun from the Earth, it was closer than we ever thought. The popular estimate of approximately ninety-three million miles appeared to be a mistake, as inconceivable as it seemed.
Hickson pored through the methods that his predecessors had used to calculate the distance and the accounts of their work, searching for the means to disprove his theory but instead he found a mistake in Dr. Hailey’s diurnal method. Invented by Hailey in the nineteenth century and used as a basis for many other calculations about our solar system.
We can only imagine that Hickson must have gritted his teeth when he set himself the challenge of proving Dr. Hailey’s error. Kings Dethroned is the result of his research, and through his retracing of the steps of astronomers from the Roman Empire all the way up to the present day, we can see an accurate representation of the planets and our sun.
Gerrard Hickson, unlike his predecessors, took his findings to the general public and published this book for the consumption of all. Having been rejected or ignored by experts and scientific societies across the western world, he chose to trust in the public. He felt that the truth and his discovery were the wealth of the whole human species and in this modern age it does the reader only good to contemplate the necessity of constant and honest scientific enquiry. ”