Difference between revisions of "Ring Laser Gyroscope"
Tom Bishop (talk | contribs) |
Tom Bishop (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
As stated above, the results of the Michelson-Gale-Pearson experiment were inconsistent and an algorithm was applied to get the desired result. If we are to say that the Ring Laser Gyroscope is the same device, then the same criticism would apply. | As stated above, the results of the Michelson-Gale-Pearson experiment were inconsistent and an algorithm was applied to get the desired result. If we are to say that the Ring Laser Gyroscope is the same device, then the same criticism would apply. | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
===Cause of Noise=== | ===Cause of Noise=== | ||
Revision as of 17:11, 23 July 2019
The Ring Laser Gyroscope is a consumer device version of the Michelson-Gale Pearson experiment. The principle of operation of these devices is based on the Sagnac Effect, which was famed for showing that light changes velocity on a rotating platform. Like with the Michelson-Gale-Pearson experiment, some have alleged that Ring Laser Gyroscopes have detected the rotation of the earth.
From a work titled The Sagnac and Michelson-Gale-Pearson Experiments (Archive) by Dr. Paulo N. Correa we read on p.5:
“ The outcome of the MGP experiment was ambiguous, though maybe no more ambiguous than the small persistent positive shift observed in MM experiments. Composed of 269 separate tests with readings that varied from -0.04 to +0.55 of a fringe, and a mean at +0.26 fringes, the MGP experiment could be interpreted to yield a positive result of ≈ 0.3 km/s - therefore near the speed of the earth's rotation, but the result was of borderline significance. It could be said that the experiment was inconclusive because it adduced neither proof that there was a shift in the phase of the light beams, nor that there wasn't one. ”
Essentially the tests saw wild results. There was almost no change to light's velocity in one test, and then a lot of change in another test. It is perplexing that the rotation of the earth would start and stop when tested at different times. Only through the statistics was it claimed that the experiment saw the rotation of the earth. The inconsistent results were ambiguous in nature and could offer no evidence of the shift in the phase of the light beams.
As stated above, the results of the Michelson-Gale-Pearson experiment were inconsistent and an algorithm was applied to get the desired result. If we are to say that the Ring Laser Gyroscope is the same device, then the same criticism would apply.
Cause of Noise
While inconsistent experiments are invalid as demonstration of any particular cause, one potential cause of the noise in these very sensitive devices is seismic disturbance. See: Ring Laser Gyroscope - Seismology
Further Reference
- Ring Lasers - a brief history (Archive) - Describes that the Ring Laser Gyroscope is a Sagnac/MGP device.