The Flat Earth Wiki
The Flat Earth Wiki
Log in

Difference between revisions of "Water Level Devices"

From The Flat Earth Wiki
Line 5: Line 5:
 
[http://whistleralley.com/surveying/theoerror/ One surveyor describes]:
 
[http://whistleralley.com/surveying/theoerror/ One surveyor describes]:
  
{{cite|'''As any surveyor should understand, all measurements are in error. We try to minimize error and calculate reasonable tolerances, but error will always be there. Not occasionally; not frequently; always. In the interest of more accurate measurements, we look for better instruments and better procedures.'''}}
+
{{cite|''As any surveyor should understand, all measurements are in error. We try to minimize error and calculate reasonable tolerances, but error will always be there. Not occasionally; not frequently; always. In the interest of more accurate measurements, we look for better instruments and better procedures.''}}
  
 
The greater the distance one is trying to align the devices with, the greater the potential error. All devices need to be of superior calibration, leveling, and positioning. And even then, there is always error. In the Water Level experiments with the Horizon the goal is to align something very near in the foreground with something very distant in the background.
 
The greater the distance one is trying to align the devices with, the greater the potential error. All devices need to be of superior calibration, leveling, and positioning. And even then, there is always error. In the Water Level experiments with the Horizon the goal is to align something very near in the foreground with something very distant in the background.
Line 54: Line 54:
 
==Non-Level Water Device==
 
==Non-Level Water Device==
  
A caged water device was built by a member of our forums, which showed that [https://forum.tfes.org/index.php?topic=9492.280 the device is susceptible to error]. In the following device it was seen that the liquid did not perfectly align and that water did not find its level.
+
A caged water device was built by a member of our forums, which showed that [https://forum.tfes.org/index.php?topic=9492.280 the alignment of the liquid in the device is susceptible to error]. It was seen that the liquid did not perfectly align and that water did not find its level.
  
 
[[File:Water level error.jpg]]
 
[[File:Water level error.jpg]]

Revision as of 19:44, 8 February 2019

The Water Level Devices are close-range devices that are typically used as evidence that the horizon is not at eye level. These devices are essentially a form of surveying, in which markers in the foreground are attempted to be aligned with something distant in the background.

Professional surveyors admit that the science is always in error.

One surveyor describes:

  “ As any surveyor should understand, all measurements are in error. We try to minimize error and calculate reasonable tolerances, but error will always be there. Not occasionally; not frequently; always. In the interest of more accurate measurements, we look for better instruments and better procedures. ”

The greater the distance one is trying to align the devices with, the greater the potential error. All devices need to be of superior calibration, leveling, and positioning. And even then, there is always error. In the Water Level experiments with the Horizon the goal is to align something very near in the foreground with something very distant in the background.

One may see the source of the concern by holding a grain of rice right up next to their eye and imagine trying to align it with something that is 24 miles away. Your hand's position and rice alignment needs to be absolutely perfect, else large errors result.

Water Not Level

Surface Tension

It has been found that the water in these devices are subject to surface tension and capillary action, and that the levels are not actually level.

From Encyclopedia Britannica we see:

Surface tension effects.png

Capillary Action

Further, it is apparent that capillary action needs to be taken into account.

Pascals Vase.jpg

Pascals Vase Heights.png

Foreign Substances

It is seen that it is also possible for foreign substances, such as from alcohol or dye used in the experiment, to cause misalignment, since the weights of those fluids isn't consistent with the weight of the water.

From a problem on Chegg Study we find a depiction of unknown liquids floating on water:

Unknown Liquids.png

Susceptible to Large Errors

It is seen that if the alignment of the water is not perfectly level, and that there is a slight imperfection, then a small misalignment in the foreground will create a large result in the background. The below illustration demonstrated the matter.

Level-misaligned.png

Essentially, a very small angle misalignment with the line of sight of bodies in the foreground creates a very large angle numerous miles away.

Inconsistent Results

In one water level device the 'leveled line' appears to change significantly in relation to the mountain in the background with different poisons and sequences, despite the line appearing to be leveled.

Bobby red level 1.jpg Bobby red level 2.jpg Bobby red level 3.jpg Bobby red level 4.jpg

Non-Level Water Device

A caged water device was built by a member of our forums, which showed that the alignment of the liquid in the device is susceptible to error. It was seen that the liquid did not perfectly align and that water did not find its level.

Water level error.jpg

Horizon Line Height Variable

Additionally, it should be noted that it has been shown that the height of the horizon is susceptible to the atmolayer. On different days the height of the water in the background changed. The following is from a member of our forums:

Horizon Height Atmolayer.jpg